-
Portland, Oregon attorney David F. Sugerman handles class action and injury cases for Oregon consumers. David has extensive trial and appellate experience with disputes involving dangerous products, injuries, class actions, consumer fraud, and toxic exposures. David was admitted to practice in 1986.
Tags
Andrew Cohen Ballot Measure Case update Chip Shields Civil Rights Comcast comments Corruption Death. And taxes. death penalty Dog stories Earl Blumenauer employment First Amendment Gitmo detainees health care reform income tax Kate Brown Kurt Schrader late fees Le Cordon Bleu Portland mandatory arbirtation Mark Nelson Mother Jones MSNBC NBC Nightly News New York Times Nick Kahl Oregonian Oregon vote by mail Our Oregon payday loans President Obama Senator Dorgan Senator Merkley Senator Wyden sex abuse Sugerman Suzanne Bonamici terrorism Texas the kicker Toyota recall trial waiver-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- admin on Honda civic hybrid class action settlement faces social media backlash
- Jerry Poel on Honda civic hybrid class action settlement faces social media backlash
- Larry Wick on Sen. Santorum and the hyporcisy of damage caps
- admin on Sen. Santorum and the hyporcisy of damage caps
- Denise A. Valenti on Sen. Santorum and the hyporcisy of damage caps
Archives
Categories
Links
- Oregon Consumer For Oregon consumers – family safety and consumer protection information
- RSS Feed/Subscribe via Feedburner
Latest Post
A modest proposal: Close your Umpqua Bank account
Great coverage here in today’s Oregonian by Brent Hunsberger regarding Umpqua Bank’s decision to cram mandatory arbitration down the throats of Umpqua customers. If you’re an Umpqua Bank customer, you might want to seriously consider moving your funds to a credit union.
By way of background, the U.S. Supreme Court decision last year in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion touched off a race to the bottom. The Court gave corporations great power to require customers to take any disputes to arbitration, while banning class actions.
The Court fell for the old Lucy, Charlie Brown and the football argument that arbitration is cheaper, easier and better for consumers. Arbitration is none of those things to consumers–especially in small consumer cases. In those cases in which the amount at stake might be $20-200, arbitration filing fees, hearing fees and arbitrator payment fees effectively bar individual consumers from pursuing their claims.
When the likes of Umpqua Bank and ATT Mobility engage in small-dollar rip offs of many consumers, they earn large amounts of money. To put it concretely, if a bank illegally charges five dollars each year to a million customers, it earns $5 million per year in illegal profits. In the past, consumer lawyers have stopped that nickel and diming by pursuing class actions. If a class of a million consumers collects $5 per consumer plus attorney fees and costs, does anyone think the bank will continue the illegal practice?
Banks–and those who represent them–dislike class actions. They settled on a simple strategy. Ban class actions and require consumers to go to arbitration. Ending consumer class actions is a bit like filling the slop pit for a bunch of hungry swine. They’ll be all over that deal.
Once the Supreme Court decided ATT Mobility v. Concepcion, banks, cell phone providers, credit card companies–hell, almost any big business that sells things or services under a written contract–all rushed in for the feeding frenzy. So I guess it is no surprise that Umpqua wants to get in on the action.
So where are consumers in this? If you care about this issue and you are an Umpqua customer, the best response is to vote with your feet. Move it to a consumer-friendly credit union. Because if enough Umpqua customers move, I’m guessing they will get a little nervous. And if a lot of Umpqua customers move, I’m thinking they might get a lot of nervous.
So do it if you can. If they can’t treat us better than slops in a trough, seems to me they don’t deserve our business.
Recent Posts
-
Sen. Santorum and the hyporcisy of damage caps
I’ve heard so much about the Santorum surge and how he is a man of principle–a values candidate, a different kind of politician. Senator Santorum has been part of the echo chamber for caps on damages in medical injury lawsuits. … Continue reading
-
Oregonian on BP consumer fraud class action
The Oregonian picked up the filing of the BP class action. Their report is here on OregonLive. More on the case–including a copy of the initial complaint (pdf)–is here. A few clarifications: 1. The case covers only debit card purchases … Continue reading
-
BP faces Oregon consumer fraud class action
You pull into one of BP’s Oregon ARCO or AM?PM stations, and fill up with gas. The street signs tells you that gas costs a specific amount; maybe $3.50 per gallon. BP’s ARCO and AM-PM advertise some of the lowest … Continue reading
-
KBR gets slapped down by National Arbitration Forum over domain name dispute
I always enjoy a good smack down. Especially when it is well-deserved. Today, the National Arbitration Forum issued its decision in KBR, Inc. v. Jeffery L. Raizner, Claim Number FA1110001413439. For those playing along at home, here is a pdf … Continue reading
-
Honda civic hybrid class action settlement faces social media backlash
It sounds like a lousy class action settlement, though it is possible that it is not as bad as it sounds. This report in the LA Times, about a pending class action settlement on behalf of consumers who bought the … Continue reading
-
For-profit colleges apparently prefer lawsuits to increased regulation
When the Obama administration announced stricter regulations on for-profit trade schools, the lucrative industry went on the offensive, hiring the best lobbyists money could buy. “Best,” of course, means most effective and should not be confused with doing what is … Continue reading
-
Update: Consumer fraud class action against Career Education Corp and Western Culinary
This is a short update for all following our consumer fraud class action against Career Education Corporation and its Portland culinary school, Western Culinary Institute/Le Cordon Bleu Portland. We’ve been waiting for a ruling from Judge Baldwin on Career Education … Continue reading
-
On Veterans’ Day, let’s hold KBR accountable
So here is what is happening in my law office today, Veteran’s Day, 2011: Kevin Stanger is giving a deposition in Bixby v. KBR, the case in U.S. District Court here in Oregon where veterans dare to call corporate giant … Continue reading
-
Career Education Corporation and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day
Last week, Career Education Corporation’s stock took a breathtaking fall. It started with the resignation of Gary McCullough, the CEO. That happened so quickly, he did not even have time to offer the usual walk-the-plank rap that he was leaving … Continue reading
-
Fighting the robber barons: Illegal debt card charges for overdrafts
News today that West Coast Bank reached an agreement with the FDIC relating to its “courtesy coverage” overdraft protection. According to Brent Hunsberger’s report in The Oregonian, the issue was ineffective opt outs. But there is a bigger problem with … Continue reading
