-
Portland, Oregon attorney David F. Sugerman handles class action and injury cases for Oregon consumers. David has extensive trial and appellate experience with disputes involving dangerous products, injuries, class actions, consumer fraud, and toxic exposures. David was admitted to practice in 1986.
Tags
Andrew Cohen Ballot Measure Case update Chip Shields Civil Rights Comcast comments Corruption Death. And taxes. death penalty Dog stories Earl Blumenauer employment First Amendment Gitmo detainees health care reform income tax Kate Brown Kurt Schrader late fees Le Cordon Bleu Portland mandatory arbirtation Mark Nelson Mother Jones MSNBC NBC Nightly News New York Times Nick Kahl Oregonian Oregon vote by mail Our Oregon payday loans President Obama Senator Dorgan Senator Merkley Senator Wyden sex abuse Sugerman Suzanne Bonamici terrorism Texas the kicker Toyota recall trial waiver-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- cheryl coffelt on Comcast Oregon late fee class action settlement receives final approval
- Teddy Ruxbin on Comcast Oregon cable TV late fee class action settlement update
- Richard Vangelisti on Memo to the Oregon Legislature: Healthcare Transformation Starts with Patient Safety
- Darren Kolar on Comcast Oregon cable TV late fee class action settlement update
- Darren Kolar on Comcast Oregon cable TV late fee class action settlement update
Archives
Categories
Links
- Oregon Consumer For Oregon consumers – family safety and consumer protection information
- RSS Feed/Subscribe via Feedburner
Category Archives: U.S. Supreme Court
A modest proposal: Close your Umpqua Bank account
Great coverage here in today’s Oregonian by Brent Hunsberger regarding Umpqua Bank’s decision to cram mandatory arbitration down the throats of Umpqua customers. If you’re an Umpqua Bank customer, you might want to seriously consider moving your funds to a … Continue reading
Reviving the plutocracy–U.S. Supreme Court ends consumer class actions
A win for the plutocracy* Yesterday’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion represents a breathtakingly bad opinion that does profound harm to consumers. It’s a bit geeky, but the takeaway is that this is a huge win for … Continue reading
Interesting: Souter takes on originalists at Harvard
For those who watch the U.S. Supreme Court, a theory of constitutional interpretation–so-called “originalism”–is now in vogue. The theory, which is often mouthed by politicians, suggests that the only way to interpret the U.S. Constitution is to look at what … Continue reading
Up is down-Republican leaders call for judicial restraint from Obama Supreme Court nominee
It’s official. Justice Stevens announced his retirement from the U.S. Supreme Court effective the end of this term. Court watchers have been speculating for a while that this would happen. Here is one of many news reports. I’m taken by … Continue reading
Oh Yes he did: President Obama calls out Supreme Court
Much is being written about President Obama’s first State of the Union address. I didn’t hear the whole thing, but thanks to the miracle of the interwebs, video clips are up. One has already caught my eye. First some background. … Continue reading
Posted in Corporations running amok, U.S. Supreme Court
Tagged First Amendment, President Obama
3 Comments
This free speech case brought to you by….
This isn’t my usual gig. After all, to paraphrase one of my heroes, Senator Sam Ervin, I’m just a simple trial lawyer. I am no federal constitutional scholar. Nor am I ever likely to argue in the U.S. Supreme Court. … Continue reading
Posted in Corporations running amok, U.S. Supreme Court
1 Comment